Winston Churchill is one of the prominent figures of the 20th century.
He is acclaimed for leading the British people in their heroic battle against Nazi Germany in the Second World War, and against Japan.
Many people, however, condemn him for his anti Indian stand. Churchill hated Indians, calling them ‘ a beastly people with a beastly religion ‘, and was totally against granting independence to India, being a die hard imperialist.
Leo Amery, the former Secretary of State for India, in his private diary wrote ”On the topic of India, Winston is not quite sane”.
This was during the Second World War, and Churchill is blamed for
(1) taking away rice stocks from Bengal to feed the British armies
(2) ordering destruction of rice stocks in Bengal so that they do not fall into the hands of the Japanese invaders (who had already conquered Burma) if they conquered Bengal., and
(3) refusing to send food from Australia to Bengal, as he thought such relief would accomplish little as ‘Indians breed like rabbits’.
According to the historian Arthur Herman, Churchill’s main concern was the ongoing war against Germany and Japan, leading to his decision to divert food supplies from India to Allied military campaigns.
Indians, however, while rightly condemning Churchill’s attitude towards India, need to take a more balanced view. Who can forget Churchill’s role in the fight against Nazi Gemany in the Second World War?
At a time when Adolf Hitler had conquered most of Europe, and Britain stood alone and isolated, Churchill heroically, and with dogged determination, led the British people against the looming forces of Nazi barbarism.
Some people may say how did it matter to Indians whether Hitler had conquered England or not? They forget that fascist domination in the world, as indeed was Hitler’s aim, would have been a far greater evil than British imperialism.
India is not isolated in the world, and it too would have come into the fasist grip if Hitler had succeeded. Similarly, if the Japanese had conquered India, it would have come under the Japanese fascist jackboot, with Indians having no liberties at all, instead of having some limited liberties under British rule.
This aspect should also be considered by Indians when evaluating Churchill.
Disclaimer : PunjabTodayTV.com and other platforms of the Punjab Today group strive to include views and opinions from across the entire spectrum, but by no means do we agree with everything we publish. Our efforts and editorial choices consistently underscore our authors’ right to the freedom of speech. However, it should be clear to all readers that individual authors are responsible for the information, ideas or opinions in their articles, and very often, these do not reflect the views of PunjabTodayTV.com or other platforms of the group. Punjab Today does not assume any responsibility or liability for the views of authors whose work appears here.
Punjab Today believes in serious, engaging, narrative journalism at a time when mainstream media houses seem to have given up on long-form writing and news television has blurred or altogether erased the lines between news and slapstick entertainment. We at Punjab Today believe that readers such as yourself appreciate cerebral journalism, and would like you to hold us against the best international industry standards. Brickbats are welcome even more than bouquets, though an occasional pat on the back is always encouraging. Good journalism can be a lifeline in these uncertain times worldwide. You can support us in myriad ways. To begin with, by spreading word about us and forwarding this reportage. Stay engaged.
— Team PT