Appointment to high offices in India

Markandey Katju

Markandey Katju

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
In Western countries, the fact that a person is gay, or in a live in relationship, would be irrelevant for appointments to high offices under the state.

A lawyer based in Delhi with a good law practice was recommended by the Indian Supreme Court Collegium in November 2021 for being appointed as a judge of the Delhi High Court.

Ordinarily when the Supreme Court Collegium, which is a body of 3 senior-most Supreme Court judges headed by the Chief Justice of India, recommends someone for appointment as a High Court judge, the Government of India accepts the recommendation and the appointment is made.

However, when the government did not make the appointment for a long time I asked a sitting senior Supreme Court judge for the reason. He said that the reason why the government was not willing to accept the recommendation was because the lawyer was openly gay.

Now in Navtej Singh Johar vs Union of India, a verdict delivered in 2018, the Supreme Court decriminalised gay sex, and declared that a gay person enjoyed all the rights available to others, including the right to equality. It logically followed that a person could not be denied appointment as a judge just because he was gay.

Nevertheless, the Indian Govt was not willing to appoint a gay person, even though he had been recommended by the Collegium of the Delhi High Court as far back as in 2017, and the recommendation had been approved by the Supreme Court Collegium. The appointment has yet not been made, and it is doubtful it will ever be made.

When I was Chief Justice of Delhi High Court, I was inclined to recommend a lawyer having a good practice and good reputation for appointment as a judge of the Delhi High Court.


However, the recommendation for appointment as a High Court judge has to be made by a Collegium of 3 senior most judges of the High Court, including the Chief Justice, but not by the Chief Justice alone.

One of my 2 colleagues in the Collegium strongly opposed my proposal, saying that the lawyer was in an open live in relationship with a lady lawyer. Consequently the recommendation could not be made.

These instances show the difference between values in India and Western countries.

In Western countries, the fact that a person is gay, or in a live in relationship, would be irrelevant for appointments to high offices under the state. In India, and probably in most underdeveloped countries, the situation is otherwise.

In India gay sex or live in relationship is not a criminal offence, nevertheless, it is unlikely that an openly gay person, or a person in an openly live in relationship, will be appointed to high offices, e.g. as a Minister, a Judge, or a bureaucrat.

This is because though the law in India has been largely modernised, and we have a Constitution granting modern rights (personal liberty, equality, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etc), Indian society is still largely conservative.

lawFor instance, though gay relationships are now legal (after Navtej Singh Johar’s case), most Indians still frown on it, and on live in relationships. Many regard them as totally abhorrent.

Consequently there were, and are, no gay judges in the Indian judiciary.

This is unlike the situation in Western countries, where many gay persons are judges

Similarly, in Western countries, the fact that one is in a live in relationship will not be a ground for denying him/her appointment as a judge, if the person is otherwise qualified and deserving.

In India, however, it is very unlikely that a person in a live in relationship will be appointed as a judge, however qualified and deserving he/she may be.

And this situation is likely to continue for a long time to come.


Also Read:

75 years of hope and despair

Centre’s Opaque Auction Rules For Pulses Rip Off Govt Coffers, Help Millers Strike Rich

Need to amend laws like UAPA to provide for punishment for those who slap false cases

Global Arms Trade: Who are the real winners?

Why not 40 pc tickets for women in Punjab and elsewhere?

Punjab – How a deadly cocktail of Agri-Water-Energy nexus going to destroy it?

North Pole and the ideological conflict of RSS & Hindutva

Politics of Symbolism: Dalit Chief Ministers in India


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
Share on linkedin
Markandey Katju

Markandey Katju

Justice Markandey Katju is former Judge, Supreme Court of India and former Chairman, Press Council of India.

Disclaimer : and other platforms of the Punjab Today group strive to include views and opinions from across the entire spectrum, but by no means do we agree with everything we publish. Our efforts and editorial choices consistently underscore our authors’ right to the freedom of speech. However, it should be clear to all readers that individual authors are responsible for the information, ideas or opinions in their articles, and very often, these do not reflect the views of or other platforms of the group. Punjab Today does not assume any responsibility or liability for the views of authors whose work appears here.

Punjab Today believes in serious, engaging, narrative journalism at a time when mainstream media houses seem to have given up on long-form writing and news television has blurred or altogether erased the lines between news and slapstick entertainment. We at Punjab Today believe that readers such as yourself appreciate cerebral journalism, and would like you to hold us against the best international industry standards. Brickbats are welcome even more than bouquets, though an occasional pat on the back is always encouraging. Good journalism can be a lifeline in these uncertain times worldwide. You can support us in myriad ways. To begin with, by spreading word about us and forwarding this reportage. Stay engaged.

— Team PT

Author Related Post
Related Post

Copyright © Punjab Today TV : All right Reserve 2016 - 2022